Podcast 32: Habeas Corpus (Part 1)
Habeas Corpus is the right to a speedy trial, bond and extradition.
Habeas Corpus is the right to a speedy trial, bond and extradition.
We discuss exigent circumstances when police may or MAY NOT conduct a warrantless search and seizure
A Michigan Search & Seizure case goes from the Michigan Supreme Court to the United States Supreme Court!
Is it considered an unreasonable seizure of a person to stay with the police, while they execute a search warrant of your home? To what extent can we give credibility to an informant regarding the information they tell the police?
This time, we address search & seizure from the police officer’s point of view.
The MI Constitution has a provision which mirrors the US Constitution’s 4th Amendment. But we give a little extra…sorta!
When may the State of Michigan impair a contract between two private parties?
We will finish our conversation about Ex Post Facto laws and why substantive, versus procedural, rights are the main factor we review to determine if a law change is an ex post facto violation. We have a two prong test, and then (wait for it) a 7-factor test to roll through! Now, don’t skip out. We don’t review all 7, we merely discuss the factors which are most relevant to our cases at hand!
We are continuing our coverage of Article 1, Section 10 of the Michigan Constitution. Remember, there are technically three provisions which make up this one Section. Before, we covered Bills of Attainder. Now we’re going to address Ex Post Facto laws. These laws are prohibited because, by and large, the make actions criminal which were NOT criminal at the time they were committed. But the key to an actual ex post facto law entails 4 designations. We will talk about them and when laws are (but mostly aren’t) Ex Post Facto, thus unconstitutional.
A bill of attainder occurs when the Michigan Legislature criminalizes something you did in the past, when it wasn’t illegal to do it, and does not provide you with a judicial trial. This podcast will review situations where individuals believed the Legislature took an action, against them as a Defendant, and attempted to make their behavior a criminal in nature, without the benefit of a trial.